*First appeared in the April 16 edition of the Laurel Chronicle newspaper.
Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you already know the primary race for U.S. Senate between long-time incumbent Thad Cochran and Jones County native state Senator Chris McDaniel is pretty…heated, for lack of a better word.
In my mind, the real casualty of this primary battle isn’t either candidate, but rather the future of the conservative movement in Mississippi. If you believe the talking heads, the Twitter trolls, the “lame-stream” media, the Facebook status-sharers, then you believe there’s a war raging between “establishment” Republicans and Tea Partiers.
To that I say, poppycock.
We’ve seen this scenario play out across the country, where newly formed political groups (such as Tea Party factions and others) unilaterally decide “their” candidate is the most conservative and best choice for office. If you don’t support our guy, they’ve said, then you must be “establishment.” These groups have in large part been egged on by national organizations with access to experienced lawyers, ruthless campaign operatives, and individuals with deep pockets (think: green).
Seems like this strategy has finally come home to roost, so to speak, right here in Mississippi.
This week the Mississippi Tea Party called on Mississippi Republican Chairman Joe Nosef to “stay out of the Mississippi U.S. Senate Primary or resign.” Wowzers!
The Tea Party is offended the MSGOP chairman said Chris McDaniel ought to clear up as fast as possible the rumor that he was participating in an event with a vendor selling “white pride” paraphernalia.
Nosef went further, saying running for the “United States Senate is a very important thing and as a party we need to always be careful and focused and serious about what our views are and what our interests are.”
This is reasonable advice to me. It actually sounds like something my father might say: Address rumors head on; tell people the whole story; and then go on about your rat-killin’. People are going to believe what they’re going to believe.
The Tea Party’s next complaint against Nosef was his recent appearance on the Paul Gallo radio show. During the show, Nosef said “primaries are always going to get dirty” and that he was bothered by the motives of out-of-state groups involved in Mississippi’s Senate race (many of these groups were involved in states where the Republican nominee ultimately lost the general election).
My paraphrasing of his comments: When Republicans lose general elections, they also lose the ability to impact policy-making.
In my opinion, this is a bad thing for conservatives. We can’t enact conservative legislation without first winning elections.
I’m not sure why the Mississippi Tea Party didn’t like Nosef’s comments which were, once again, very practical in nature. I daresay his comments are exactly what the chairman of the Republican Party ought to be saying: Let’s win elections. Let’s enact conservative policies. Let’s be smart about both of those things by working together, not against one another.
And that’s really what worries me. The Mississippi Tea Party and related groups are organized by conservative Mississippians who believe in the conservative principles of the Republican Party. I’m a big tent ideologue and tend to believe we all fall somewhere in that tent.
Yet all of this talk of “establishment” versus “Tea Party” versus “libertarian” versus so-on and so-forth isn’t helping the conservative cause. The Democrats won’t need to divide and conquer if we voluntarily divide ourselves.
If the conservative movement is to survive – and thrive – then we mustn’t let out-of-state groups dictate our in-state relationships, nor rush to judgment when party officials like Chairman Nosef offer up common-sense advice to Republican candidates.
May I respond to the "Let's Win Elections" mantra that seems to be all the rage among establishment Republican types? The implied message here is that the Tea Party is only interested in ideological purity, while the establishment GOP is focused on "winning elections." Governor Chris Christie made the statement that "I am not in this business to win the argument. I am in this business to win elections." Mississippi GOP chairman Joe Nosef made a similar comment via Twitter. I find these kinds of comments to be complete nonsense. Of course we all want to win elections. But simply saying you want to win elections is not enough. You have to have a strategy. You have to have to take principled conservative positions and make the case to the voters as to why the conservative vision is best. You can't simply just make broad statements like "we have to focus on winning elections."
ReplyDeleteAllow me to give you an example. Suppose you were granted the privilege of observing your favorite college football team's coaching staff as they put together their game plan for the upcoming big game. I don't know who your favorite team is, so let's use mine, Mississippi State. The Bulldogs are preparing to play Alabama, and it's going to be a very tough game. The assistant coaches are discussing the strategies they think the Bulldogs need to implement in order to win the game. One coach says he thinks the Bulldogs need to pass the ball more. Another thinks the key is the running game. The two coaches begin to make impassioned pleas to the other coaches and to the head coach that their strategy is best. The discussion becomes heated over which players and what plays can be used to give the Bulldogs their best chance to win.
Suddenly, you can't stand the argument any more. You jump up and say, "Hey guys, forget all this arguing, let's just focus on winning the game." Wouldn't that be a silly thing to say at that point? Of course it would, because just like in a football game, you have to do more than merely say that you want to win. You have to have a strategy to win. The Tea Party wants to win the election as badly as does the establishment. The reason that there is a Tea Party in the first place is because the GOP establishment has screwed up the last two Presidential elections with terrible strategy. They run mush candidates who stand for nothing. The Republican leadership continually gets run over by Democrats in every negotiation. Republicans retreat at the first sign of opposition by Democrats.
We in the Tea Party want to win, but we realize that the path being followed by the GOP establishment is not a conservative path. It's a path of weakness, retreat & surrender. We're simply saying that if we as a party want to win, we have to return to genuine conservative principles. We must make our case to the voters in a strong and convincing manner. And you don't do that with mush-mouth moderates who stand for nothing. You do that by contrasting yourself with your opponent by laying out the case for conservatism and convincing the voters that the conservative vision is best.
But I do worry about party unity. Unfortunately the condescension and nastiness of the GOP establishment towards Tea Party voters is going to make it hard for many Tea Party voters to enthusiastically support Thad Cochran should he win the nomination. I'm not saying they won't support Thad. Most will. But it won't be the kind of enthusiastic support that the party needs. Likewise, should McDaniel win, I fear many of the GOP establishment will pull a Richard Lugar and refuse to support him. It's a shame that this election can't be contested on issues alone, but Henry Barbour and the GOP smear machine is making sure that won't happen.
Please tell me that now that shots have been fired across the bow from the Clarion-Ledger that a reply is on the way?
ReplyDelete